EVE Search - W space little things.

All Channels

Wormholes

W space little things.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 4 post(s)
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 119	Posted - 2014.07.02 07:30:00 - [1] - Quote [quote=Bleedingthrough]Could we get fixed signature IDs? Signature ID change after DT is a pain in the ass. You basically have to probe down your pipe twice if you want to be sure about connectivity. quote] No. just no. On another note, can we get the ability to split the probe scanner and d-scan from the same nested window? You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 120	Posted - 2014.07.02 07:51:00 - [2] - Quote Ahost Gceo wrote: Hatshepsut IV wrote: [quote=Bleedingthrough]Could we get fixed signature IDs? Signature ID change after DT is a pain in the ass. You basically have to probe down your pipe twice if you want to be sure about connectivity. quote] No. just no. On another note, can we get the ability to split the probe scanner and d-scan from the same nested window? How about you support why you would say no to that? Its an idea I think will not greatly change things for good or bad, and quite honestly I've found myself sighing in the morning while staring at the siggy list knowing I'll have to scan everything down again. Fine. Because seeing which sigs are new vs from downtime is a very usefull way to judge activity and sort likely WH canidates from systems with 20+ sigs. If you jump into a system 16 hours into a day with only two new sigs its a good bet that the new sigs are potentially k162s. It makes chasing down activity to shoot at easier. Like following breadcrumbs. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 126	Posted - 2014.07.02 17:35:00 - [3] - Quote Shinjo Bajahnhosuu wrote: This comes up for me during escalations, but please make it possible to "untag" a ship in the overview. Right now if you accidentally tag the wrong ship or want to switch to a different set of sleepers due to range you can't remove a tag. This makes things very confusing. It doesn't remove the niceness of a clear tags hotkey but till they do, drop a can and use that to cycle through tags. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 132	Posted - 2014.07.08 06:55:00 - [4] - Quote A strip all roles button for CEOs. The ability to partition SMA's with divisions would be a nice compromise to the personal SMA's everyone clamors for but CCP doesn't want to give us. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 145	Posted - 2014.07.18 02:57:00 - [5] - Quote How bout the ability to move more then 5 bookmarks at a time, even if its just 10 it would be a nice timer saver. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 154	Posted - 2014.07.22 19:12:00 - [6] - Quote Brutus Crendraven wrote: ...Enhance the danger / risk ration. C1 Actually good isk for a small corp. C2 Terrible sleeper loot, but nice access to HS C3 Good isk for small corp. C4 Pointless C5 Excessive ISK C6 Excessive ISK... These represent nothing more then your own personal opinion formed about the amount of isk pulled in. C4s are far from pointless and are actually some of the best isk to be made for small/solo groups and its a good deal safer half the time then c2/3 with its higher traffic. c5/6 isk is really only good when you are doing it solo/few people double boxing. When done this way you are a giant target. For the mid/larger groups that isk divided up between all the people doing it and taxed to support the corp/alliance cost its really not what you and all the other cry foul high class people have all the toys make it out to be. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 168	Posted - 2014.07.29 17:33:00 - [7] - Quote How about the ability to flag certain bookmarks/folders undeletable? You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 169	Posted - 2014.07.29 17:37:00 - [8] - Quote Andrew Jester wrote: Hatshepsut IV wrote: How about the ability to flag certain bookmarks/folders undeletable? Truly a small thing because it's easily avoidable if you're not dumb, but it would be really nice to just be able to ctrl+a delete everything instead of having to be selective. Exactly my thinking, would make it nice for newbros to just have them nuke the BMs when a chain gets rolled and not worry bout other stuff getting the axe. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 169	Posted - 2014.07.29 18:09:00 - [9] - Quote Nullsec gets moongoo income. We get escal income. Which doesn't even come close but it works we like it. Anyone suggesting to remove the escals for multiple days that benefits 2-3 farming corps more. They still get their payouts while alliances get their ability to fund fuel and srp and such slashed. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 232	Posted - 2014.08.23 02:24:00 - [10] - Quote Ability to tell if a module or drone is damaged at a glance from CHA/PHA You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 232	Posted - 2014.08.23 02:41:00 - [11] - Quote Winthorp wrote: Hatshepsut IV wrote: Ability to tell if a module or drone is damaged at a glance from CHA/PHA Hmm interesting idea, maybe a damaged module could appear fractured or splintered on your HUD. That or a red bar/dot something to indicate something's not a 100 percent mod. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure
Hatshepsut IV Cascading Failure Un.Bound 254	Posted - 2014.09.06 16:23:00 - [12] - Quote Trinkets friend wrote: How's about.... Timers for your polarisation, similar to aggro. The icon should be of two hands coming in from left and right and gripping a circle, representing that you cannot jump through the hole. It should be red, of course, and flash a lot. I might be remembering wrong but I believe Fozzie mentioned this during the last WH townhall and he said they would like too but its a little complex. You too can start failing today! Reddit-áad \| Cascading Failure Public Channel \| Aspiring Failure

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.